I'm Surprised I Even Found the Time to Write This Blog

I'm not gonna sugar coat it. It doesn't deserve a mulligan. And it definitely doesn't deserve to be ignored. Unlike most of our politicians out there, I'm not gonna try and spin this in my favor. Not that I could if I tried.

I have been a terrible blogger fourth quarter. Actually, let me rephrase that: I haven't blogged fourth quarter. Period.

It's embarrassing. Frankly, it was hard to force myself to boot up my browser and type that. But in the spirit of an american studies student, its time to be critical of myself. Its not time to piece together 8 blogs to get my total to the required amount. Its not time to make excuses. Its time to look in the mirror and ask the american studies question: WHY?

After thinking about the reasons for my failure, I realized why I have failed in my duty as an american studies student: I lost sight of the importance of the little things like blogging. Even if I have had to dedicate large portions of my time to the ACT, SAT, AP Tests, Track, Junior Theme, and Finals, I still have to find time to fulfill my duty as an american studies student and blog. I have battled the monster that is Junior Year, and though I have survived, I have lost. Even through all the tough accomplishments I have succeeded in, I have lost track of the truly important goal: to develop as a student and citizen of todays world. I forgot that although the big things like AP Tests are important, so are the small things like blogging. How can I expect to succeed next year if I do all the hard things that people lament about, like writing college essays, but then forget to put it in the mail. Seem like a relatively easy and simple thing to do, that you don't need to worry about? Well then, I guess you're not going to college.

And in the end, although I have failed, I have succeeded. Although I don't expect to get a good grade in blogging this quarter, I have learned a much more valuable lesson than any A on my report card could ever teach me: To lose sight of small and seemingly inconsequential things in my time management process is the same as not doing the big things that seem more important. You need the yin with the yang. The peanut butter with the jelly. The good with the bad. You cant choose one and hope for the best.  If there was one thing I still remember from second grade, it was Mrs. Morris telling the class that "fifty percent of doing your homework is remembering to bring it to school." This lesson couldn't be truer now. Sure, I turned in a solid Junior Theme. But without the blogging to go with it, I'm losing an essential part of the american studies learning experience.

So fine, Mr. Bolos and Mr. O'Connor, you can give me a bad grade on blogging for fourth quarter (its not as if I expect this one post to change your mind. I fully expect to fail). But it won't matter. Because the lesson I have taken away from looking critically at my own writing overshadows anything I could have learned from blogging,or the benefit of a boost to the GPA. By neglecting my duties as an american studies student, I have succeeded at the same time.

Be a follower, Microsoft!

Two days ago, Google ceased censoring its search results in China. Although the possibility of this happening has been around for a while, with China pleading Google to comply with its strict internet policy, it is a monumental event in a country where censorship is a part of daily life. China's strict policy involves censoring search results that aren't favorable to the government. Up till now, no company has disobeyed China's demands, choosing to go along with China even at the loss of human rights.

In addition, Congress today praised Google's decision in a hearing today, saying the decision to stop censorship "was the right decision". But they didn't stop there. Representative Chris Smith, a republican from New Jersey, said that "They [Microsoft] need to get on the right side of human rights rather than enabling tyranny, which they're doing right now." Is Smith right that Microsoft is "enabling tryanny"? Or are they simply following the status quo is a country where censorship has been the norm for many years? In addition, is it smart for the U.S. government to take such a strong stance on the issue? Regardless of whether its right or wrong, is it worth possibly jeopardizing our foreign relations with the biggest country in the world? 

Safety v Entertainment

At the recent General Manager meetings in Boca Raton, Florida, all the National Hockey League GMs got together to discuss pressing issues pertaining to the NHL. One of the main topics discussed was that of dangerous hits to the head. One of the main reasons this was such a talked about topic was because of the recent hit on Boston Bruins Center Marc Savard, who has a grade 2 concussion and will likely be out the rest of the season. As fun as watching bone-crushing hits can be, is it worth the potential for injury? And its not like this is just an issue for hockey, either. In baseball, pitchers throw hard baseballs in excess of 90 mph. Although it provides excellent entertainment, watching someone get hit in the face and crumple to the ground is a truly horrifying thing to watch. In nascar, drivers drive at ridiculously high speeds in order to entertain the public. But when does the risk for gut-wrenching crashes outweigh the fun of the race? Although Nascar has recently taken precautions to help prevent crashes, just last week Brad Keselowski was flipped during the race, creating a serious safety hazard for the racers and the fans. Although it is obvious that sports need risk to be entertaining, just when does that risk cross the line? When does it become too dangerous to risk? And are leagues doing enough to prevent serious injury for their athletes and participants. As Sam noted in her blog, Melted Crayons, without danger, sports wouldn't be near as exciting. But at what point does that danger step over the line?

A Dominance of Epic Proportions

A few weeks ago in class, we talked about the treatment of women's sports compared to men's sports. One of the examples of a women's sport which wasn't getting as much attention as it should was NCAA Women's Basketball, where the University of Connecticut women have reeled off a record seventy one wins in a row. For some perspective, the Washington Capitals recently made big news by winning fourteen consecutive hockey games, their franchise record and the longest win streak of the season for any team. If you multiply that streak by 5 .... you still don't have the amazing streak the UConn women have accomplished. And yet, unless you follow NCAA Women's basketball, you probably haven't heard about the streak more than a few times in passing. The only reason the UConn Huskies' streak has recently been more publicized on ESPN and Sportscenter is because the Huskies just broke the old NCAA basketball record of 70 wins set by ... the UConn women's team from 2001-03! If that isn't enough to get noticed, what is? It's not like the Huskies don't play good teams. In fact, they schedule as many top 5 opponents as possible, only to destroy them as convincingly as if they were a High School team. In addition, they have arguably the two best players in the country, in Tina Charles (pictured) and Maya Moore. By being so completely dominant (and basically assuring themselves of a national championship), have the UConn Huskies Women's team actually hurt the popularity of their sport? Or is it just that women's sports won't be as popular as men's sports for the foreseeable future, even in the face of a dominant team such as the Huskies?

A Diverse Curriculum

              Today in class, we talked about the value of classes in the arts, such as dance and orchestra, as opposed to the value of technical classes such as math and science. The general consensus was that both groups of classes are very important to the development of students in many different ways. However, our educational system in the united states clearly values the technical classes, where a definite test and grade be given afterwards, and which better prepare you for your future career, supposedly.

             This made me think of the colleges I am looking at, and what type of classes they focus upon. As I blogged about in my earlier blog about diversity in colleges, I have started looking at colleges, and thinking about what trends appeal to me. One of the most important things to me in a college was its value on a liberal arts education. But as I thought about this ideal, I realized that I didn't really have any reasoning to back me up on my preferences. Its not like taking a class in Ancient Roman history would help prepare me for an engineering major. But yet, a liberal arts education still appealed greatly to me. But why?
             I believe that the reason I value the well-rounded education a liberal arts college would give me relates a lot to my life goals. As I commented on the An American Studies blog run by Mr. Bolos and Mr. O'Connor, my "green light", or goal, is to be able to escape the North Shore bubble I live in and experience all the diversity and treasures the rest of the world has to offer. By having an education at a Liberal Arts oriented university, I would be able to experience a lot more diversity in my education than focusing on a primarily technical course load. What are some other reasons for valuing a Liberal Arts education, or more specifically, what are some reasons for valuing arts classes such as music?

Tiger's Apology

On Friday of this week Tiger Woods, the embattled golfer, made his first public appearance since news of his infidelity became public. In case you've been hiding out in a cave for the past couple months, here's the rundown: Just after Thanksgiving, Tiger Woods crashed his car near his house, raising many questions as to how the event happened. Tiger, typically a very private celebrity, was mum on the whole situation. Soon, however, news broke that Tiger had been having an affair, and Tiger decided to take an extended absence from golf to save his marriage with his wife Elin. It was rumored that Tiger had checked into a sex addiction clinic. Friday, however, was the first day that Tiger came out and talked to the public about his much talked about private life. A video and transcript can be seen here.
Coming into his press conference, I was really rooting for Tiger. I was really hoping that he would make a sincere apology, and that we could put a lot of this behind us. And after watching the speech, I was surprised. Just definitely not in a good way. Not only did he read a completely prepared speech, but he showed no emotion. Well, thats not completely true. When he was bashing the media for attacking his family, he was clearly very angry. So rather than give a sincere apology, he was blaming it all on the media? Seriously? There were plenty of things he could've done to make his apology seem more legit. He could've brought in a speech that wasn't completely prepared. Would it have killed you to bring in a few bullet points Tiger? That way, we could've heard your own personality more, and we wouldn't have to watch you look down at your paper ever two and a half seconds. And it sure wouldn't have hurt if you had let people ask you questions afterward, so that maybe we could've gotten some answers other than just the ones you wanted us to. Overall, Tiger's speech seemed fake and prepared, not the kind of apology that was needed to change the public opinion of you as a cheater. But am I right in bashing Tiger, or was his speech really one of true regret?

Well at least my college has Diversity!

         Recently I have started looking at different colleges, and I've noticed that colleges tend to be judged based on their biodiversity. Whether its NYU or Johns Hopkins, two very diverse schools, or Lehigh and Bucknell, two schools described as mostly rich white kids, there can be a large disparity in the diversity of colleges. This brought up a lot of questions: Why do schools become either diverse or not very diverse? Whose fault is it that colleges are diverse or not? And more importantly, why is it a big deal that a college is very diverse or not? To me, it shows a major flaw in our country when you are congratulated because you are diverse. If race wasn't a prevalent issue in our country, not only would diversity hopefully be much higher, but it wouldn't be such a big deal to be a heterogeneous campus.
        When looking at the diversity of a school composed of all upper class white kids, its a wonder why there aren't more people of color at the college. Is it the majorities fault? I find it hard to believe that the people at the school would actively try to keep out minorities, so its fair to say its not their fault their college isn't diverse? What about minorities? If I were them, I would prefer to go to a place where there was a lot of diversity, so I wouldn't be so out of the ordinary, so its clearly not their fault either. Which brings up the possibility that history plays a large role: the college has been homogeneous for so long, it would be really hard to change that because of the stereotypes and judgments that have been associated with it. And we can look at our society as a whole in the same context. Is it fair to say that it's no ones fault that our society isn't equal, because of the long history of inequality that have been present? Or is it someone's fault that our society is the way it is?